Educational content on VJNeurology is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

Share this video  

AAN 2025 | A comparative analysis of DOACs and VKAs for the treatment of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis

Artur Menegaz de Almeida, Federal University of Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso, Brazil, discusses a comparative analysis of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for treating cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. The analysis found no differences in outcomes, such as partial and complete recanalization, and modified Rankin scale scores, between patients treated with DOACs or VKAs. This suggests that both interventions may have similar benefits for patients with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. This interview took place at the 77th American Academy of Neurology (AAN) Annual Meeting in San Diego, CA.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

So in our research we aim to perform a comparative analysis of direct oral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists for treating cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. So cerebral venous sinus thrombosis is a rare type of stroke that occurs in the dural veins. So these kind of patients had to be treated with anticoagulation, right? So there’s no substantial research supporting the use of any of them, either direct oral anticoagulants or vitamin K antagonists...

So in our research we aim to perform a comparative analysis of direct oral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists for treating cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. So cerebral venous sinus thrombosis is a rare type of stroke that occurs in the dural veins. So these kind of patients had to be treated with anticoagulation, right? So there’s no substantial research supporting the use of any of them, either direct oral anticoagulants or vitamin K antagonists. So our work aimed to fill this gap in the body of evidence by proving that one of them is better than the other, okay? So we directly compared these two agents through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Then we performed a systematic review and we included a total of 10 studies, being six RCTs and four observational studies with over 2,000 patients. So we performed many outcomes like partial re-canalization, complete re-canalization, and any recanalization and we found no differences between groups for these outcomes. So we also assessed the modified Rankin scale 0 to 2 and 3 to 5 and we also did not find any differences between groups. So in conclusion our meta-analysis found no differences between groups of patients with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis treated with DOAC or VKA. In conclusion, our study supports that both intervention and control may have similar benefits for these kind of patients.

 

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...