In fact, I think we already do use biomarkers to lead secondary preventive treatment decisions. In a way that for example atrial fibrillation is in some ways defined by an EKG biomarker. But the field is aiming towards using more fine-tuned, more granular, more precise biomarkers, both blood-based and also imaging or from other modalities such as from an EKG. Because in fact secondary prevention relies on defining the etiology of the patient, the cause that led initially to the stroke of an individual patient and we are not good at doing this clinically...
In fact, I think we already do use biomarkers to lead secondary preventive treatment decisions. In a way that for example atrial fibrillation is in some ways defined by an EKG biomarker. But the field is aiming towards using more fine-tuned, more granular, more precise biomarkers, both blood-based and also imaging or from other modalities such as from an EKG. Because in fact secondary prevention relies on defining the etiology of the patient, the cause that led initially to the stroke of an individual patient and we are not good at doing this clinically. Up to 40% or 50% of patients we do not know the etiology so we need novel tools, novel biomarkers to define this, to understand the underlying mechanisms, and then to guide secondary prevention. And this will all be elaborated on tomorrow in this teaching course.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.