Rare disease registries are an important tool because they allow us to put together data from a relatively high number of patients for rare diseases and they tell us what to expect in terms of disease evolution, in terms of treatment response, in terms of safety of drugs. So, registries really need to be developed more and more. One problem is how to do this because of course everyone could eventually set up a registry, but some kind of standardization is needed in this field so that we have a high quality, interoperable (this is a very important point for registries) dataset...
Rare disease registries are an important tool because they allow us to put together data from a relatively high number of patients for rare diseases and they tell us what to expect in terms of disease evolution, in terms of treatment response, in terms of safety of drugs. So, registries really need to be developed more and more. One problem is how to do this because of course everyone could eventually set up a registry, but some kind of standardization is needed in this field so that we have a high quality, interoperable (this is a very important point for registries) dataset. Then one could use these for different purposes, to know more about the natural history of the rare disease, to have access for a clinical trial, to decide what biomarkers are more important, to see what’s the long-term safety of the new drugs. So, there is really lots of information that a registry could give us, but they need to be built in a specific way in order to address the most important questions.
And so, Residras is one of the registries that has been designed for specifically Dravet syndrome and so far, has been populated in Italy, which I think now we have over 500 patients, but it’s also being expanded to international level. So ideally, we become an important tool for this rare epileptic encephalopathy, and it will be more and more important now that we have an increasing number of treatments for this condition.