We performed an external validation study using a two-center prospectively maintained stroke registry at Jikei University. We compared six established prediction scales to see which one accurately predicts ICAD-related LVO. The results show that only the REMIT scale and the score ICAD show robust performance. But the most important insight came from our component analysis. We calculated the odds ratio for every single component of all six scales...
We performed an external validation study using a two-center prospectively maintained stroke registry at Jikei University. We compared six established prediction scales to see which one accurately predicts ICAD-related LVO. The results show that only the REMIT scale and the score ICAD show robust performance. But the most important insight came from our component analysis. We calculated the odds ratio for every single component of all six scales. And as a result, imaging factors outperform clinical factors. While clinical factors like atrial fibrillation absence are important, it’s only indirect information. So imaging factors show atherosclerotic burden directly. That’s why imaging factors are more important than clinical factors. With these insights, I’d like to refine these prediction strategies using various imaging factors.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.