It’s a bit of two separate questions because for neurofilament light chain there are already now some recommendations that can be applied and it’s more and more used already worldwide and I think it should be used at diagnosis and then if possible at regular intervals to assess the current state of inflammatory disease activity and to assess the potential response to DMTs, to treatments...
It’s a bit of two separate questions because for neurofilament light chain there are already now some recommendations that can be applied and it’s more and more used already worldwide and I think it should be used at diagnosis and then if possible at regular intervals to assess the current state of inflammatory disease activity and to assess the potential response to DMTs, to treatments. For GFAP, I think now with this study, we can show that even in large settings, this seems to provide big information on future progression risk, but the exact implementation in the clinic is a bit less clear but I would personally say that it provides very useful information and so I would see it in addition to MRI information to clinical information as an additional parameter to assess the patient’s state regarding the risk of progression and this can then help to assess the correct treatment choice, for example.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.