Educational content on VJNeurology is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

Share this video  

EAN 2026 | One big question with Richard Nowak: what MG advance could transform care in the next 3 years?

Richard Nowak, MD, MS, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, discusses the key advances in myasthenia gravis (MG) that could transform care in the next three years. Dr Nowak highlights the potential value of a biomarker to predict treatment response, as well as the induction of immune tolerance. This interview took place at the 12th Congress of the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) in Geneva, Switzerland.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

That’s a fantastic question, and I think that’s a question that might not have one specific answer to. I think one major impact that we can have in transforming care is a biomarker that predicts how an individual with myasthenia gravis might fare in terms of their outcomes and predict responsiveness to certain therapeutics that we have available to us. So currently, we have a great number of targeted therapies available to us...

That’s a fantastic question, and I think that’s a question that might not have one specific answer to. I think one major impact that we can have in transforming care is a biomarker that predicts how an individual with myasthenia gravis might fare in terms of their outcomes and predict responsiveness to certain therapeutics that we have available to us. So currently, we have a great number of targeted therapies available to us. But the question that comes up, not only for clinicians treating patients with myasthenia gravis, is which medication to choose, when, and is this going to achieve clinical outcomes in our patients that we care for? And the answer is we don’t know unless we try the medication first. So a biomarker predicting treatment response is critically important and is currently a major knowledge gap. I would sort of add one additional thing to that in what I think can be very transformative, which is the induction of immune tolerance. So we have medications that can treat the underlying disease drivers, but we don’t have a way to restore immune balance for our patients. Looking at the dysregulation that occurs in all autoimmune conditions, including myasthenia gravis, if we had a way to have the immune system restore self-tolerance, we could essentially and effectively cure disease or have at least sustained and durable responses over time. That’s not in the next three years. I think that’s more of a long-term five- to ten-year potential transformative area. So getting back, I think biomarkers are really key and an unmet need at this point in time.

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...