Educational content on VJNeurology is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

Share this video  

ACTRIMS 2026 | HSCT in multiple sclerosis: current evidence and patient selection

Jeffrey Cohen, MD, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, discusses current evidence for the use of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in multiple sclerosis (MS), and which patient populations may benefit the most from this treatment approach. Prof. Cohen notes that the literature indicates potent efficacy of HSCT in MS, but the studies have some limitations, and the treatment’s placement in the overall treatment sequence remains uncertain. This interview is part of our coverage of the 11th Annual Americas Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ACTRIMS) Forum, held in San Diego, CA.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

Well, so there’s been interest in hematopoietic stem cell transplant for autoimmune diseases, including multiple sclerosis, for now 20 or 30 years. And there’s a rather sizable literature that indicates that it has very potent efficacy in multiple sclerosis and that that benefit is durable. It lasts for many years in most patients without the need for restarting disease therapies. However, that literature has some shortcomings...

Well, so there’s been interest in hematopoietic stem cell transplant for autoimmune diseases, including multiple sclerosis, for now 20 or 30 years. And there’s a rather sizable literature that indicates that it has very potent efficacy in multiple sclerosis and that that benefit is durable. It lasts for many years in most patients without the need for restarting disease therapies. However, that literature has some shortcomings. Most of the studies were uncontrolled case series or Phase II trials. And there only are two randomized trials supporting the use of hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Both of those studies showed superior efficacy of transplant, but the comparator group had some issues in both studies. In one study, the comparator group was mitoxantrone, novantrone, a disease-modifying therapy that we no longer use because of toxicity. And the other randomized trial, the MIST trial, only about half of the patients in the medication arm in that trial received what we would currently consider a high-efficacy therapy. So as a result, precisely where to place hematopoietic stem cell transplant in our overall treatment sequence remains somewhat uncertain. The accumulated evidence suggests that hematopoietic stem cell transplant is most effective for treating relapses and ongoing MRI activity, and that it’s less effective for slowing or preventing disability worsening. So as a result, the people that are most likely to benefit from transplant are those who are relatively young with relatively recent disease onset, active disease, by which I mean recent relapses or MRI changes, and who have had continued activity despite treatment with one or more medications, but who have only mild or moderate accumulated disability. Conversely, people who are less likely to benefit and are more likely to sustain harm are older people with more severe non-active progressive MS and who have other comorbidities that might increase the medical risk of the procedure.

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...

Disclosures

Personal compensation for consulting for Astoria, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Convelo, Kite Pharma, Legend Biotech, Novartis, polTreg, PSI, and Shionogi, and Chairing a DSMB for Celltrion.