So we obviously know that OSA is a very prevalent disorder, right? It affects 1 billion people worldwide, but how come only 80% of them remain undiagnosed? And so we wanted to fill this gap by using a machine learning model to basically screen for OSA. And currently, the paradigm for screening for OSA is they’re using STOP-BANG. However, clinicians frequently report that STOP-BANG is very inconvenient, takes a lot of effort, and they just don’t want to do it anymore...
So we obviously know that OSA is a very prevalent disorder, right? It affects 1 billion people worldwide, but how come only 80% of them remain undiagnosed? And so we wanted to fill this gap by using a machine learning model to basically screen for OSA. And currently, the paradigm for screening for OSA is they’re using STOP-BANG. However, clinicians frequently report that STOP-BANG is very inconvenient, takes a lot of effort, and they just don’t want to do it anymore. And so what if we can make a model that just passively runs in the background and alerts the clinician when someone’s at risk for OSA? And so that’s why we use electronic health records because it is so broadly available and everyone has electronic health records. So we can just make a model that can run in the background and alert the physician. So our model, we developed two of them, can predict both OSA and OSA severity. So any OSA or moderate to severe OSA. And our model uses labs, comorbidities, demographics and vitals all in a 106 feature model; however, we wanted to simplify things so we also created a minimal four feature model that only includes age, sex, BMI, and race ethnicity and we found that the minimal model actually performs almost as well as the full model. And so, but we consider this actually a very encouraging finding because the minimal model is significantly easier to implement because it only takes four features. And so we’re thinking that the minimal model should be our primary model to implement in all sorts of healthcare systems. But for healthcare systems who prefer accuracy and a better performance, they would prefer to use the full model for their studies. We validated this model internally and externally at a site called KUMC. And we also compared it to STOP-BANG, where it outperformed STOP-BANG statistically significantly in both AUC and net benefit. This model, we believe, has the potential to basically replace STOP-BANG as the primary OSA screener just because of how low effort and how scalable it is.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.