So the study for bemdaneprocel was a Phase I open label and it’s primarily a two-year study. The safety and efficacy were looked at sort of separately. So safety and tolerability were the primary endpoints at one year and the study met the safety and tolerability endpoints. In terms of efficacy, those are mostly secondary clinical evaluations, secondary endpoints that we looked at...
So the study for bemdaneprocel was a Phase I open label and it’s primarily a two-year study. The safety and efficacy were looked at sort of separately. So safety and tolerability were the primary endpoints at one year and the study met the safety and tolerability endpoints. In terms of efficacy, those are mostly secondary clinical evaluations, secondary endpoints that we looked at. And for the most part, there was either stability or some positive signals. But again, it was a small sample size. So when you’re evaluating motor and non-motor outcomes in Parkinson’s and such a small sample, one or two patients can really skew things. But overall, it was either no worse or maybe some signs of improvement or some trends in improvement, particularly in patients who got the higher dose of the cell therapy. So all of it is exciting and reassuring and we’ll be proceeding with the Phase III trial shortly in the next few months.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.